For the fiscal year 2022, the Department of Education was granted <\/span>about $76.4 billion<\/span><\/a>. This was the most significant increase for federal education programs in just about ten years, compared to the beginning of 2021, with this year’s $2.9 billion increase. For example, the Safe Schools and Citizenship Education programs saw a massive increase over the previous year, about $361 million compared to $217 million in 2021. <\/span><\/p>\n School districts have been using their allotted federal stimulus dollars in many different ways in response to the pandemic. Some schools have bought new technology and equipment to help with the remote learning process, while others have replaced their entire ventilation systems to make their buildings safer for students. <\/span><\/p>\n Since the beginning of 2020, when the pandemic first started, school districts have received about <\/span>$190 billion of emergency funding<\/span><\/a> from the federal government. The most recent influx of cash assistance is about $123 billion through the American Rescue Plan. However, it’s important to note that this money must be spent by fall 2024. <\/span><\/p>\n Because there is a timeline to use the money from the government, school districts are rushing to determine the best use for the funding. In addition, there are current programs in some places that are being exclusively funded by the emergency stimulus, which will need alternate funding sources once the stimulus money runs out. <\/span><\/p>\n Sustainably maximizing these funds is one of the most challenging parts of the looming funding cliff. For example, the <\/span>Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund<\/span><\/a> (ESSER Fund) must obligate funds by September 20, 2022. This means that some of the money has to find a home soon. Here are some examples of what ESSER funds can be used for:<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n Some essential considerations can help create a buffer for the incoming funding cliff. First, instead of creating more problems after the funding goes away, focus some of the funding on necessary one-time costs. <\/span><\/p>\n It’s best not to rely on the potential for funding extensions, despite this possibility. However, some states are taking steps to use local funding to help ease the funding cliff. There are some potential issues with this, though, as the national economy continues to face some challenges. <\/span><\/p>\n Some schools are putting their funding in reserve accounts to help in the future when the budgets are a little tighter. However, some of the emergency funding needs to be spent rather than saved, complicating this strategy in some cases. <\/span><\/p>\n According to Chad Aldeman, policy director of the Economics Lab at Georgetown University in EdWeek, “When this money runs out, it’s going to feel bigger and worse than the last time federal money ran out.” <\/span><\/p>\n In the quote, Alderman talks about the last funding cliff in 2009, when $50 billion in aid was delivered to districts through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. In this case, there were severe cuts, teachers were let go, and some schools were even shut down. <\/span><\/p>\n With this previous disaster in mind, schools are hoping to get out ahead of the fallout of this pandemic-related funding cliff. Because the country has such a diverse population, schools, and requirements, every district’s answer will be different. The local and state funding hills vary widely from state to state, so that the budgeting shifts will reflect that. <\/span><\/p>\nFederal stimulus <\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"Funding](\"https:\/\/i.ibb.co\/3TPQPBn\/Article-Images-25.jpg\")
How will schools use this funding? <\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
Creating a soft landing for the future funding cliff<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"Funding](\"https:\/\/i.ibb.co\/TYKJt84\/Article-Images-24.jpg\")
A strategy for the future funding cliff<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n